Posted by admin on 14 June 2024 12:08:16 PM
Hello Artfighters,

Based on staff discussion and user feedback, we have made adjustments to the rules regarding suggestive themes. The edited rules can be found here.

   First and foremost, we’d like to clarify the reason that the changes to our suggestive themes filter had been made, specifically the section related to removing fetish art from the site, even if tagged under suggestive themes.

   Previously, we have had issues with a certain subset of users intentionally drawing art for (or requesting art from) unsuspecting and non-consenting users, some of whom were minors, that contained fetish art. This is called “fetish mining,” a practice wherein a user intentionally ropes another into participating in fetish works without the other user’s knowledge and consent. In order to combat this and reduce mod strain, we decided to remove fetish works from the “allowed” list under suggestive themes.

   Ultimately, after careful consideration of user feedback as well as several rounds of internal review, we decided that the removal of all fetish works was not going to help us combat this issue. Instead, it led to more uncertainty (as it is difficult to define what isn’t/is a fetish when it comes to suggestive work), as well as more moderator strain due to needing to delete all prior attacks/characters involving fetish. Instead, we have edited the filtering guide to once again allow fetishes, with the caveat that any works have to be non-penetrative (i.e. no people/objects are allowed to enter the body), cannot involve ageplay, consent play, or bodily fluids/waste, and MUST be filtered under suggestive themes. For those affected by moderator action following the previously made changes, you are free to reupload your characters so long as the works they are involved in keep in mind our guidelines. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused!

   Additionally, we have also added General Rule 11 to combat fetish mining. It reads as follows:


  • 11. Fetish mining, which involves soliciting fetish art without the knowledge and consent of the user involved, is a bannable offense.

User Questions

1. What is considered fetish art? How does staff determine what is/isn’t fetish?


  • Fetish art consists of content that is intended to provide sexual gratification to the viewer/artist via a specific scenario/object.  The artwork may or may not initially appear “SFW” to someone who is not aware of said fetish. Regardless, if any content is intended to satisfy a particular fetish, it MUST be filtered under suggestive themes.

2. Are drawings of trans characters or characters who do not conform to gender norms considered fetish art?


  • No. Trans characters and gender non-conforming characters are not inherently fetishistic and would never need a sexual themes filter on this basis alone.  We have been and always will be an LGBTQ+ positive and friendly space. We care deeply about making other LGBTQ+ folks comfortable in all of Art Fight's spaces and ask that if you see any homophobic, transphobic, or other forms of discriminatory content on-site to please report it or contact a moderator about it as soon as possible.

3. Are drawings of fat characters considered fetish art?


  • No. Drawings of fat characters on their own are not inherently fetishistic and will not be considered fetish art. The same goes for any body type, whether exaggerated cartoonishly or not. The initial wording of “over-exaggerated proportions” was intended to refer to fetish art, not cartoonish works or different body types. We recognize the initial wording was poor, and it has since been removed.

4. Will I get banned if I unintentionally create fetish art?


  • No. We only ban for fetish mining if we are sure, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that it is both intentional and targeting minors or non-consenting adults. Users who have unintentionally appealed to a fetish will not be punished. For fetish characters needing moderator action, such as those without a suggestive themes filter or characters participating in fetishes that are disallowed on Art Fight, you would simply be alerted to the changes made by a moderator after the necessary actions were taken.
  • If you have any specific questions about particular characters or fetishes, feel free to DM a moderator that is okay with receiving questions about suggestive content.
Other Updates


  • A minor update has been made to the phrasing regarding NSFW content involving feral characters. Previously, the text had stated: “This includes characters who are sapient, alien creatures/animals, or monsters/fictional creatures.” This text was intended to specify that ANY feral creature, regardless of being made-up or real, couldn’t be drawn in suggestive or explicit situations. Due to confusion regarding these rules, we have altered it to read: “This also includes fictional or made-up animals.”

Additionally, we’ve made some minor changes to the following rules:

  • General Rule 7: Specified that comments are included
  • Upload Rule 1: Added additional bullet point
  • Upload Rule 3: Added additional bullet point regarding uncredited photography
  • Upload Rule 5: Specified policy on smaller creators
  • Upload Rule 6: Clarified that characters based on current real life tragic events are not allowed
  • Spirit of Art Fight Rule 6: Clarified that "point farming" is not allowed
  • Filtering/Attack Guides: We're currently working on updating visuals and removing old/inaccurate images from our guides


   We acknowledge the unfortunate timing of this newpost. We’ve been actively working on these changes throughout the week, and believe it'd be ideal to sort everything out on-site before the stream so as to not confuse the influx of users that become active once the theme has been revealed. We understand the importance of this issue, and want as many people as possible to see the changes made, so we will be linking back to these updates in the next few newsposts to ensure that all users are well aware of the changes made.

Comments (280)

wlf said:
I'm glad that ageplay is banned as that stuff is really nasty - but I'm just wondering if you'd also be banning nonsexual age regression stuff along with that? 
Keileon said:
I'd like to clarify to people who think petplay is immoral that petplay has NOTHING to do with actual animals. It's about dehumanizing and humiliation, and is a subset of degredation as a kink. It's harmless, and I hope that it doesn't get banned because people are too caught up on the whole "treating the sub like an animal" thing.
THANK YOU!! 🌻💚 this is already so much better 
THANK YOU SPAIN 😁😁😁 /ref
thanks artfight!!!! super excited and once again if it isnt heroes vs villains i will be Sad
I asked and hoped the mods would revise and expand on the clarification on the matter before the event started. Well, I got what I wanted - The swift communication is appreciated.  
Thanks to the AF team for having the sense to read & listen to your userbase's feedback and concerns.
 
[And so the Theme Reveal waiting game continues]
Caize Not really vague. especially with seeing a lot of rule changes on many sites lately very often i see fetish content tend to be restricted heavily or banned altogether.

I usually wonder why myself till i've started noticing either being pressured and/or forced to by payment processors. But i do see why staff have to make rules like that. 

But i do wish the staff here actually clarify what is or isn't allowed on here cause that would make things a lot clearer.
Zickeyo said:
thank u sm for fixing the rules lmao anyway yippee 
celestia said:
I think these clarifications are better and I'm not against the inclusion of harmless fetishes with consent practices in place, but I'm disconcerted as to why things like sn*ff or petplay aren't listed as disallowed if ageplay and consent play are listed, when they all have inherent roots in illegal shit? 
If you're going to give your users the grace of being able to post fetish and want to avoid mod strain for dealing with cases that aren't clearly defined, I think the list of disallowed unethical fetishes needs to be carefully expanded on!
Reading this in my non-native language at 02:41am with the light of my phone right in my eyes was obviously not a good idea, but okay! Still trying to understand some things but I think I get the most of it 
Caize said:
Sketchkolbold that's vague and not related to what i said
Sialyxz said:
Guys, I just turned on light mode to check if any of my font appears invisible to others and to anyone who uses light mode main, you are a stronger man than I am 
Happy AF! Excited for the theme reveal~
Thank you so much! 
Thank you for this update! The filter guidelines now seem reasonable and I'm glad to see the artfight staff listening to their userbase ^^ Of course I still think the filters can be improved, but for now i'm just glad I can feel excited for this years artfight again instead of uneasy about the site's stances on these things. I can't wait to get back on the drawing refs grind, it'll be so nice to be able to prep with my friends and be really excited again instead of stressed about the state of the site!   Though I do agree with other comments I've seen on this post, write-in filters would be a great improvement to the site I'd love to see implemented in the coming years. Thanks again staff for listening and especially to the users who spoke up about this! Have a great Artfight 2024 and I hope to see you on the battlefield! ^^ Freakyfights back on😳
Eclipsze said:
soo glad these rules were revised! this seems like perfect middle ground for everyone.
SkyKid said:
Thank you for the clarifications and transparency. So glad that these rules ended up getting revised.